In the Philippines they do not have Tort law or bankruptcy law. The Republic Acts do not include or define Tort law. The most similar concept to Torts is Quasi-delict or negligence. The primary difference is that there is no concept of absolute liability for a manufacturer or employer as we have the U.S.
Another major difference is that the plaintiff has the burden of proof in negligence cases, and the injured person’s (plaintiff’s) actions are taken into account. This is a relatively large burden of proof, which is one of the reasons why the courts in the Philippines are not overburdened with negligence cases.
An additional difference between the U.S. and Philippines legal system is how bankruptcy is handled. Bankruptcy is covered by the insolvency acts, and the burden of proof is on the debtor. Usually this type of bankruptcy does not result in the dissolution of debt, instead the debt is restructured. So unlike in the U.S. if you declare bankruptcy in the Philippines you like still have to pay your debt.
One of the most apparent differences between the two systems is that there is no trial by jury in the Philippines. This can be attributed to Spanish influences. The trials are decided by judges, which can be an issue if one believes the judge to be unfair.
If you have interests in learning more about the legal system in the Philippines, or are interested in volunteering with Enhance a Village click here.